<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Vick - A Repulsive Individual? Maybe. A Criminal? No.</title>
	<link>http://bradharper.com/2007/07/29/michael-vick-a-repulsive-individual-maybe-a-criminal-no/</link>
	<description>an outlet for the sake of my wife and friends...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 05:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: brad harper : living first hand &#187; The Cleanest Line</title>
		<link>http://bradharper.com/2007/07/29/michael-vick-a-repulsive-individual-maybe-a-criminal-no/#comment-10804</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bradharper.com/2007/07/29/michael-vick-a-repulsive-individual-maybe-a-criminal-no/#comment-10804</guid>
					<description>[...] That &amp;#8216;clean line&amp;#8217; to determine lawfulness is individual rights. Objective law is based on a standard to punish and preclude forceful encroachment of individual rights (life, liberty, and property). If that standard is abandoned, there is no logical limit to what can be criminalized - the result is mob rule. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That &#8216;clean line&#8217; to determine lawfulness is individual rights. Objective law is based on a standard to punish and preclude forceful encroachment of individual rights (life, liberty, and property). If that standard is abandoned, there is no logical limit to what can be criminalized - the result is mob rule. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bradharper.com : blah, blah, blah&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stomping On The Rights Of Michael Land</title>
		<link>http://bradharper.com/2007/07/29/michael-vick-a-repulsive-individual-maybe-a-criminal-no/#comment-256</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bradharper.com/2007/07/29/michael-vick-a-repulsive-individual-maybe-a-criminal-no/#comment-256</guid>
					<description>[...] Once again we see the ominous perils of subjective law. Invoking force against an individual is only proper as a response, or as an extremely rare preclusion, to that individual&amp;#8217;s violation of another&amp;#8217;s right to life, liberty or property. Law based on any other basis is nothing more than mob rule, where legal objectivity is mere inconvenience. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Once again we see the ominous perils of subjective law. Invoking force against an individual is only proper as a response, or as an extremely rare preclusion, to that individual&#8217;s violation of another&#8217;s right to life, liberty or property. Law based on any other basis is nothing more than mob rule, where legal objectivity is mere inconvenience. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

